SMRF vs. POW
SMRF (ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMRF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
SMRF vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMRF
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- 6M
- 39.30%
- YTD
- 42.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMRF vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF | 0.00% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 15.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMRF and POW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMRF vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMRF vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMRF drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, roughly equal to the maximum POW drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRF and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMRF | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -17.41% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -16.37% | +2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -4.18% | -2.55% |
Volatility
SMRF vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMRF | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.61% | 32.79% | +11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.61% | 32.79% | +11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.61% | 32.79% | +11.82% |
SMRF vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMRF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMRF vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
SMRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, more than POW's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% |
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMRF and POW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMRF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMRF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
SMRF has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.13% for POW.
They also come from different issuers: ALPS and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMRF and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for SMRF and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer