SMQ vs. SARK
SMQ (Tradr 1X Short Innovation 100 Monthly ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMQ charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
SMQ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMQ achieves a -15.77% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -2.68% return.
SMQ
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- YTD
- -15.77%
- 6M
- -14.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- -32.77%
- 3Y*
- -29.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMQ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMQ Tradr 1X Short Innovation 100 Monthly ETF | -15.77% | 0.39% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -2.68% | 0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMQ and SARK is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMQ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
SMQ
SARK
SMQ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1X Short Innovation 100 Monthly ETF (SMQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.47 | -0.22 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
SMQ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMQ drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMQ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.62% | -81.07% | +53.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.66% | -78.52% | +54.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -46.52% | +38.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.63% | — |
Volatility
SMQ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 36.71% | -17.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 56.30% | -37.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 56.30% | -37.12% |
SMQ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMQ has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMQ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
SMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than SARK's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 2.90% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
SMQ Tradr 1X Short Innovation 100 Monthly ETF | 0.29% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMQ and SARK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SMQ.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.29% for SMQ.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SMQ and 0.75% for SARK.
Find the right allocation for SMQ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer