PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOX vs. SIXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOX vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOX achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 3.41% return.


SMOX

1D
0.05%
1M
2.23%
YTD
17.11%
6M
17.62%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIXL

1D
-0.16%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
3.41%
6M
2.41%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOX vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMOX and SIXL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.48

SMOX vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOX
SIXL

Industrials

22.1%
6.4%

Financial Services

15.3%
15.2%

Technology

14.4%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
6.8%

Healthcare

8.8%
14.5%

Energy

8.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

7.6%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
17.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
2.2%

Utilities

1.9%
17.3%

Communication Services

1.6%
2.6%

Industrials

SMOX
22.1%
SIXL
6.4%

Financial Services

SMOX
15.3%
SIXL
15.2%

Technology

SMOX
14.4%
SIXL
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SMOX
11.4%
SIXL
6.8%

Healthcare

SMOX
8.8%
SIXL
14.5%

Energy

SMOX
8.0%
SIXL
2.1%

Real Estate

SMOX
7.6%
SIXL
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMOX
4.9%
SIXL
17.0%

Basic Materials

SMOX
4.0%
SIXL
2.2%

Utilities

SMOX
1.9%
SIXL
17.3%

Communication Services

SMOX
1.6%
SIXL
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOX vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOX

SIXL
SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOX vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMOX vs. SIXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMOXSIXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

0.63

+1.90

Drawdowns

SMOX vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOX drawdown since its inception was -7.76%, smaller than the maximum SIXL drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOX and SIXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOXSIXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-16.08%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-6.04%

+6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-4.57%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

Volatility

SMOX vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOXSIXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

9.50%

+6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

12.14%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

12.55%

+3.00%

SMOX vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOX vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison

SMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SIXL's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SIXL
ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF
2.31%2.31%1.28%1.48%1.45%0.67%0.40%
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
0.07%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOX and SIXL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SMOX.

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.07% for SMOX.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SMOX and 0.47% for SIXL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOX and SIXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer