SMMU vs. CMDT
SMMU (PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SMMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. SMMU is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMMU returned 3.66%/yr vs 16.55%/yr for CMDT. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SMMU charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.
Performance
SMMU vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMU achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 22.69% return.
SMMU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.86%
CMDT
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 22.69%
- 6M
- 22.11%
- 1Y
- 34.25%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMMU vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 1.12% | 4.06% | 2.68% | 2.80% |
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 22.69% | 12.78% | 6.93% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMU and CMDT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023 | -0.02 |
The correlation between SMMU and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMU vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank
SMMU
CMDT
SMMU vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMMU | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 1.48 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 7.67 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.00 | 20.89 | -2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMMU | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79 | 2.77 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.29 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
SMMU vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMU drawdown since its inception was -5.09%, smaller than the maximum CMDT drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMU and CMDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMU | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -9.69% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.77% | -4.49% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.95% | -9.69% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -3.86% | +3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -2.69% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 1.64% | -1.42% |
Volatility
SMMU vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) is 0.31%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that SMMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMU | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.31% | 4.42% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.79% | 10.33% | -9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02% | 12.40% | -11.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.67% | 12.22% | -10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 12.22% | -9.49% |
SMMU vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMMU vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison
SMMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than CMDT's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.47% | 3.04% | 8.80% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 2.84% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 0.60% | 1.19% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 1.03% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMMU and CMDT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMDT has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to SMMU (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMU dropped -5.09% vs CMDT's -9.69%.
On 3-year performance, CMDT leads with 16.55% vs 3.66% for SMMU. On fees, SMMU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 16.55% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.
SMMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.47% for CMDT.
SMMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CMDT is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMMU and 0.65% for CMDT.
SMMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMMU and CMDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer