PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) and State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLN.DE achieves a 17.38% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDW.DE's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLN.DE has underperformed ZPDW.DE with an annualized return of 8.71%, while ZPDW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.


SMLN.DE

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.27%
6M
10.43%
YTD
17.38%
1Y
35.81%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
8.71%

ZPDW.DE

1D
-0.84%
1M
-0.79%
6M
11.78%
YTD
19.72%
1Y
50.51%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLN.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF
17.38%12.69%12.93%16.15%-11.17%8.51%4.78%22.29%-10.60%9.59%
ZPDW.DE
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF
19.72%27.50%22.78%33.59%-5.96%12.63%7.91%16.59%-16.65%19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLN.DE and ZPDW.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2015

0.83

The correlation between SMLN.DE and ZPDW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (5 years) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLN.DE
SMLN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDW.DE
ZPDW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) and State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLN.DEZPDW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

5.21

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

17.17

-4.52

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLN.DE and ZPDW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.33%, which is greater than ZPDW.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLN.DE and ZPDW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLN.DEZPDW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.33%

-34.37%

-64.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.65%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

-21.70%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-21.70%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.33%

-34.37%

-64.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.40%

-4.09%

-94.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.05%

-7.47%

-70.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.93%

-0.11%

Volatility

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) is 5.79%, while State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that SMLN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLN.DEZPDW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

6.68%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.59%

16.41%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.86%

20.64%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

18.81%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4,014.90%

18.43%

+3,996.47%

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLN.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDW.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLN.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMLN.DE nor ZPDW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SMLN.DE and ZPDW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZPDW.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDW.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SMLN.DE.

SMLN.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei 400, while ZPDW.DE tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to EUR Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SMLN.DE and 0.17% for ZPDW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLN.DE and ZPDW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer