SMIN vs. GIND

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SMIN (iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF) and GIND (Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF) are both India Equities funds. SMIN is passively managed, while GIND is actively managed. Over the past year, SMIN returned -8.95% vs -12.26% for GIND. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMIN charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GIND.

Performance

SMIN vs. GIND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIN achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than GIND's -8.29% return.

SMIN

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 2.75%
• YTD: -0.09%
• 1Y: -8.95%
• 3Y*: 8.59%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: 9.43%

GIND

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: -6.18%
• YTD: -8.29%
• 1Y: -12.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIN vs. GIND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF	-0.09%	3.08%
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	-8.29%	4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIN and GIND is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.89

The correlation between SMIN and GIND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMIN vs. GIND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMIN	GIND
Industrials	22.4%	12.0%
Financial Services	16.3%	29.7%
Healthcare	14.3%	7.4%
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	16.1%
Basic Materials	10.7%	7.9%
Technology	7.9%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	5.5%
Real Estate	3.2%	1.5%
Utilities	2.8%	3.6%
Communication Services	1.4%	2.2%
Energy	0.8%	3.1%

Return for Risk

SMIN vs. GIND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIN

SMIN Risk / Return Rank: 5
SMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
SMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
SMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GIND

GIND Risk / Return Rank: 4
GIND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
GIND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
GIND Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GIND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GIND Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIN vs. GIND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMIN	GIND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	-0.74	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.59	-1.00	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.89	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	-0.56	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	-1.27	+0.45

SMIN vs. GIND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is higher than the GIND Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIN and GIND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMIN vs. GIND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIN drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, which is greater than GIND's maximum drawdown of -22.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN and GIND.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMIN	GIND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.50%	-22.97%	-37.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.13%	-22.01%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.62%	-13.05%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.61%	-7.44%	-7.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.32%	9.91%	+1.41%

Volatility

SMIN vs. GIND - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) at 4.46%. This indicates that SMIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMIN	GIND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	4.46%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.91%	14.60%	+1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.02%	16.71%	+2.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.96%	17.07%	+1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.82%	17.07%	+5.75%

SMIN vs. GIND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIN has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GIND's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMIN vs. GIND - Dividend Comparison

SMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while GIND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIND Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF	2.01%	2.01%	6.84%	0.41%	0.01%	1.27%	1.06%	1.75%	1.68%	0.89%	2.30%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMIN and GIND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, SMIN and GIND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SMIN or GIND?

SMIN has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to GIND (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIN dropped -60.50% vs GIND's -22.97%.

Which ETF is better, SMIN or GIND?

On 1-year performance, SMIN leads with -8.95% vs -12.26% for GIND. On fees, SMIN is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, GIND has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMIN or GIND?

Over the 1-year period, SMIN has performed better with a -8.95% return vs -12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMIN or GIND?

SMIN is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GIND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMIN or GIND?

SMIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for GIND.

What is the main difference between SMIN and GIND?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SMIN and 0.75% for GIND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.