PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIN vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMIN vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIN achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 66.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIN has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 9.63%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.72% annualized return.


SMIN

1D
2.05%
1M
0.58%
YTD
-3.98%
6M
-3.28%
1Y
-7.97%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
9.63%

EWT

1D
-1.08%
1M
13.99%
YTD
66.46%
6M
71.46%
1Y
104.98%
3Y*
37.99%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
19.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIN vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
-3.98%-6.68%16.78%35.41%-14.23%44.43%19.59%-5.21%-25.55%62.36%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
66.46%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIN and EWT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012

0.43

The correlation between SMIN and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMIN vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMIN
EWT

Industrials

21.1%
4.9%

Financial Services

18.9%
13.0%

Healthcare

13.7%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
1.9%

Basic Materials

12.2%
3.5%

Technology

7.8%
72.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Communication Services

1.6%
1.9%

Energy

0.9%

-

Industrials

SMIN
21.1%
EWT
4.9%

Financial Services

SMIN
18.9%
EWT
13.0%

Healthcare

SMIN
13.7%
EWT
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SMIN
13.5%
EWT
1.9%

Basic Materials

SMIN
12.2%
EWT
3.5%

Technology

SMIN
7.8%
EWT
72.9%

Consumer Defensive

SMIN
4.0%
EWT
1.1%

Real Estate

SMIN
3.6%
EWT

-

Utilities

SMIN
2.7%
EWT

-

Communication Services

SMIN
1.6%
EWT
1.9%

Energy

SMIN
0.9%
EWT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMIN vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIN
SMIN Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIN vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMINEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.66

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

10.04

-10.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

30.81

-31.54

SMIN vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIN and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMINEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

4.20

-4.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.80

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.92

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.26

+0.10

Drawdowns

SMIN vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIN drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMINEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.50%

-64.37%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.54%

-10.51%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-25.66%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-38.88%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.50%

-38.88%

-21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.02%

-1.27%

-14.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-19.23%

+4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.82%

3.42%

+7.40%

Volatility

SMIN vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) is 6.11%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that SMIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMINEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

10.42%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.65%

20.58%

-4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

25.14%

-6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

22.59%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

21.60%

+1.23%

SMIN vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMIN vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

SMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than EWT's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.66%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
2.10%2.01%6.84%0.41%0.01%1.27%1.06%1.75%1.68%0.89%2.30%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMIN and EWT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to SMIN (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIN dropped -60.50% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.72% vs 9.63% for SMIN. On fees, EWT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SMIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.72% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.10% for SMIN.

SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for SMIN and 0.59% for EWT.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMIN and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer