PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIN vs. EWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMIN vs. EWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIN achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than EWM's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIN has outperformed EWM with an annualized return of 9.63%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.48% annualized return.


SMIN

1D
2.05%
1M
0.58%
YTD
-3.98%
6M
-3.28%
1Y
-7.97%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
9.63%

EWM

1D
0.61%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
3.07%
6M
7.75%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
2.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIN vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
-3.98%-6.68%16.78%35.41%-14.23%44.43%19.59%-5.21%-25.55%62.36%
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
3.07%15.74%19.46%-3.61%-6.00%-7.40%3.12%-1.41%-6.28%24.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIN and EWM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012

0.39

SMIN vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMIN
EWM

Industrials

21.1%
11.1%

Financial Services

18.9%
46.6%

Healthcare

13.7%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
1.1%

Basic Materials

12.2%
8.9%

Technology

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
7.3%

Real Estate

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.7%
10.8%

Communication Services

1.6%
6.6%

Energy

0.9%
3.9%

Industrials

SMIN
21.1%
EWM
11.1%

Financial Services

SMIN
18.9%
EWM
46.6%

Healthcare

SMIN
13.7%
EWM
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SMIN
13.5%
EWM
1.1%

Basic Materials

SMIN
12.2%
EWM
8.9%

Technology

SMIN
7.8%
EWM

-

Consumer Defensive

SMIN
4.0%
EWM
7.3%

Real Estate

SMIN
3.6%
EWM

-

Utilities

SMIN
2.7%
EWM
10.8%

Communication Services

SMIN
1.6%
EWM
6.6%

Energy

SMIN
0.9%
EWM
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMIN vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIN
SMIN Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

EWM
EWM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIN vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMINEWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.27

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

2.71

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

8.28

-9.02

SMIN vs. EWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the EWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIN and EWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMINEWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

1.52

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.34

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.15

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.07

+0.29

Drawdowns

SMIN vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIN drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN and EWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMINEWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.50%

-89.19%

+28.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.54%

-7.86%

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.58%

-21.31%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-22.76%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.50%

-43.81%

-16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.02%

-8.91%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.62%

-31.82%

+17.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.82%

2.57%

+8.25%

Volatility

SMIN vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 4.01%. This indicates that SMIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMINEWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

4.01%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.65%

10.87%

+4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

13.99%

+4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

13.70%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

16.29%

+6.54%

SMIN vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMIN vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison

SMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than EWM's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
3.31%3.41%3.32%3.47%3.00%6.48%1.89%2.91%3.84%5.58%5.97%37.54%
SMIN
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF
2.10%2.01%6.84%0.41%0.01%1.27%1.06%1.75%1.68%0.89%2.30%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMIN and EWM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMIN has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to EWM (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIN dropped -60.50% vs EWM's -89.19%.

On 10-year performance, SMIN leads with 9.63% vs 2.48% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMIN has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.

EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.10% for SMIN.

SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for SMIN and 0.49% for EWM.

EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMIN and EWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer