SMILX vs. FRGAX
SMILX (SMI Multi-Strategy Fund) and FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, SMILX returned 15.00%/yr vs 16.33%/yr for FRGAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMILX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FRGAX.
Performance
SMILX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMILX achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 9.37% return.
SMILX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
FRGAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMILX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMILX SMI Multi-Strategy Fund | 14.81% | 13.97% | 13.23% | 6.59% | -0.41% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 9.37% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 17.57% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMILX and FRGAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SMILX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMILX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
SMILX
FRGAX
SMILX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI Multi-Strategy Fund (SMILX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMILX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 3.27 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.87 | 14.61 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMILX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.55 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.54 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
SMILX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMILX drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMILX and FRGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMILX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -11.77% | -17.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -7.03% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.09% | -11.77% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -1.58% | -7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.57% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SMILX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
SMI Multi-Strategy Fund (SMILX) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 2.75%. This indicates that SMILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMILX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 2.75% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 7.19% | +2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 9.03% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 10.31% | +6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 10.31% | +4.30% |
SMILX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMILX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMILX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
SMILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 1.83% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMILX SMI Multi-Strategy Fund | 7.25% | 8.33% | 6.24% | 0.83% | 0.36% | 19.10% | 0.33% | 0.45% | 3.55% | 1.20% | 0.89% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMILX and FRGAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMILX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to FRGAX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMILX dropped -29.75% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.
FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMILX and FRGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer