PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIG vs. SVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMIG vs. SVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMIG vs. SVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SMIG
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF
2.39%0.78%17.63%13.62%-11.83%5.51%
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
5.02%8.23%7.54%12.27%-10.15%8.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIG achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than SVAL's 5.02% return.


SMIG

1D
1.38%
1M
-6.05%
YTD
2.39%
6M
0.02%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
10Y*

SVAL

1D
1.72%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
5.02%
6M
8.88%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMIG vs. SVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SVAL's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMIG vs. SVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIG
SMIG Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SMIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAL
SVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIG vs. SVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMIGSVALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

1.03

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

1.54

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.21

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

1.71

-1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.44

5.92

-4.48

SMIG vs. SVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the SVAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIG and SVAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMIGSVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

1.03

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.63

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between SMIG and SVAL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMIG vs. SVAL - Dividend Comparison

SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than SVAL's 2.50% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
SMIG
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF
1.85%1.82%1.75%1.91%2.00%0.50%0.00%
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.50%2.33%1.82%2.25%2.09%2.33%0.28%

Drawdowns

SMIG vs. SVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, smaller than the maximum SVAL drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and SVAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMIGSVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.65%

-27.44%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-13.52%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.01%

-5.64%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-8.76%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

3.90%

-0.23%

Volatility

SMIG vs. SVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is 4.02%, while iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that SMIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMIGSVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

5.71%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.36%

12.70%

-4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

22.45%

-6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

22.51%

-6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

23.50%

-7.17%