SMIG vs. BGIG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMIG (Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMIG is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bahl & Gaynor, while BGIG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bahl & Gaynor. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMIG returned 12.78% vs 20.42% for BGIG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMIG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

SMIG vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMIG having a 10.67% return and BGIG slightly lower at 10.33%.

SMIG

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: 12.78%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BGIG

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 10.33%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 20.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIG vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	10.67%	0.78%	17.63%	8.23%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	10.33%	12.49%	16.84%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIG and BGIG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	0.79

The correlation between SMIG and BGIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMIG vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMIG	BGIG
Technology	19.8%	24.6%
Consumer Cyclical	17.2%	5.4%
Financial Services	14.2%	14.8%
Industrials	13.9%	10.6%
Energy	12.8%	11.2%
Healthcare	10.1%	14.6%
Basic Materials	7.9%	0.6%
Real Estate	6.9%	3.5%
Utilities	5.4%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	6.9%
Communication Services	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

SMIG vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIG

SMIG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SMIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SMIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SMIG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SMIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SMIG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 72
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIG vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMIG	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	2.28	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	3.27	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.41	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	3.53	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	13.58	-9.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMIG vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIG and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMIG	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	2.28	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.40	-0.96

Drawdowns

SMIG vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIG drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIG and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMIG	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.65%	-13.24%	-6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-5.81%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	0.00%	-1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-1.70%	-4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	1.51%	+1.76%

Volatility

SMIG vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) at 2.59%. This indicates that SMIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMIG	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	2.59%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.39%	6.72%	+1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	8.99%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	11.94%	+4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.19%	11.94%	+4.25%

SMIG vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMIG vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

SMIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, which matches BGIG's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.74%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF	1.74%	1.82%	1.75%	1.91%	2.00%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMIG and BGIG in my portfolio?

SMIG and BGIG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMIG or BGIG?

SMIG has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to BGIG (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIG dropped -19.65% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

Which ETF is better, SMIG or BGIG?

On 1-year performance, BGIG leads with 20.42% vs 12.78% for SMIG. On fees, BGIG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BGIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMIG or BGIG?

Over the 1-year period, BGIG has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMIG or BGIG?

BGIG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMIG or BGIG?

SMIG and BGIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.74%.

What is the main difference between SMIG and BGIG?

SMIG is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BGIG is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMIG and 0.45% for BGIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.