PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMH3.L is traded in USD, while GOOO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GOOO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH3.L achieves a 270.49% return, which is significantly higher than GOOO.L's 5.17% return.


SMH3.L

1D
3.97%
1M
3.40%
YTD
270.49%
6M
270.49%
1Y
616.51%
3Y*
150.19%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOO.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.12%
YTD
5.17%
6M
4.67%
1Y
63.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
270.49%74.84%-19.00%
GOOO.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP
5.17%45.40%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH3.L and GOOO.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024

0.41

The correlation between SMH3.L and GOOO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOO.L
GOOO.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMH3.LGOOO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.55

2.64

+12.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.24

5.11

+43.12

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.20, which is higher than the GOOO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH3.L and GOOO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH3.L drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, which is greater than GOOO.L's maximum drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH3.L and GOOO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMH3.LGOOO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.38%

-26.78%

-62.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.28%

-24.17%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.70%

-12.13%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.89%

-10.09%

-37.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.69%

12.47%

+0.22%

Volatility

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a higher volatility of 40.79% compared to IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L) at 10.78%. This indicates that SMH3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMH3.LGOOO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.79%

10.78%

+30.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.81%

17.97%

+60.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.52%

49.30%

+49.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.02%

41.90%

+60.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.02%

41.90%

+60.12%

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMH3.L vs. GOOO.L - Dividend Comparison

SMH3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.69%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMH3.L and GOOO.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOOO.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOOO.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SMH3.L.

SMH3.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GOOO.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SMH3.L and 0.55% for GOOO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH3.L and GOOO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer