SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMH3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities) and 3BA.L (Leverage Shares 3x Boeing ETP GBX) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. SMH3.L is actively managed, while 3BA.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMH3.L returned 162.92%/yr vs -38.96%/yr for 3BA.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Boeing ETP GBX (3BA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SMH3.L is traded in USD, while 3BA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH3.L achieves a 330.75% return, which is significantly higher than 3BA.L's -23.36% return.

SMH3.L

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: 86.43%
• YTD: 330.75%
• 6M: 331.87%
• 1Y: 986.49%
• 3Y*: 162.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3BA.L

• 1D: -6.34%
• 1M: -23.54%
• YTD: -23.36%
• 6M: -5.79%
• 1Y: -36.33%
• 3Y*: -38.96%
• 5Y*: -46.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SMH3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities	330.75%	74.67%	66.99%	261.41%	-85.13%	4.53%
3BA.L Leverage Shares 3x Boeing ETP GBX	-23.36%	3.00%	-81.88%	85.02%	-62.40%	-2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH3.L and 3BA.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021	0.30

The correlation between SMH3.L and 3BA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMH3.L	3BA.L
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	100.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH3.L

SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

3BA.L

3BA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5
3BA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
3BA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
3BA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
3BA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
3BA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Boeing ETP GBX (3BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMH3.L	3BA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.57	-0.40	+10.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.06	-0.07	+5.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	0.99	+0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	24.87	-0.59	+25.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	81.69	-1.13	+82.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio is 10.57, which is higher than the 3BA.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH3.L and 3BA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMH3.L	3BA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.57	-0.40	+10.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	-0.45	+0.99

Drawdowns

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH3.L drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, smaller than the maximum 3BA.L drawdown of -98.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH3.L and 3BA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH3.L	3BA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.37%	-98.49%	+9.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.25%	-61.73%	+22.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.60%	-94.00%	+9.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-98.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-96.48%	+96.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.40%	-82.67%	+34.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.97%	32.15%	-20.18%

Volatility

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a higher volatility of 38.58% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Boeing ETP GBX (3BA.L) at 35.20%. This indicates that SMH3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH3.L	3BA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.58%	35.20%	+3.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.72%	68.68%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.72%	90.09%	+2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	101.12%	124.65%	-23.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.12%	124.87%	-23.75%

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMH3.L and 3BA.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

SMH3.L vs. 3BA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMH3.L nor 3BA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH3.L and 3BA.L in my portfolio?

SMH3.L and 3BA.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMH3.L or 3BA.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH3.L or 3BA.L?

SMH3.L and 3BA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.