PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMH3.L is traded in USD, while 3AAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3AAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH3.L achieves a 330.75% return, which is significantly higher than 3AAP.L's 30.83% return.


SMH3.L

1D
3.84%
1M
86.43%
YTD
330.75%
6M
331.87%
1Y
986.49%
3Y*
162.92%
5Y*
10Y*

3AAP.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
30.55%
YTD
30.83%
6M
11.01%
1Y
168.44%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
23.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SMH3.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities
330.75%74.67%66.99%261.41%-85.13%4.53%
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP
30.83%-22.82%67.19%164.98%-76.46%4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH3.L and 3AAP.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021

0.45

The correlation between SMH3.L and 3AAP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH3.L
SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMH3.L3AAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.36

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.87

3.74

+21.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

81.69

7.46

+74.23

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio is 10.57, which is higher than the 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH3.L and 3AAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMH3.L3AAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57

1.68

+8.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.43

+0.12

Drawdowns

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH3.L drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than 3AAP.L's maximum drawdown of -78.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH3.L and 3AAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMH3.L3AAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.37%

-78.42%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.25%

-44.81%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.60%

-73.03%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.89%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.40%

-35.91%

-12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.97%

22.49%

-10.52%

Volatility

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a higher volatility of 38.58% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) at 15.72%. This indicates that SMH3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3AAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMH3.L3AAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.58%

15.72%

+22.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.72%

49.41%

+21.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.72%

99.41%

-6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.12%

88.27%

+12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.12%

90.13%

+10.99%

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMH3.L and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

SMH3.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMH3.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SMH3.L and 3AAP.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMH3.L and 3AAP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH3.L and 3AAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer