SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) and SMH3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while SMH3.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. SMGB.L is passively managed, while SMH3.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMGB.L returned 57.16%/yr vs 154.10%/yr for SMH3.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SMH3.L.

Performance

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while SMH3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH3.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 85.49% return, which is significantly lower than SMH3.L's 305.05% return.

SMGB.L

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: 23.49%
• YTD: 85.49%
• 6M: 84.69%
• 1Y: 173.74%
• 3Y*: 57.16%
• 5Y*: 38.39%
• 10Y*: —

SMH3.L

• 1D: -6.35%
• 1M: 62.47%
• YTD: 305.05%
• 6M: 295.43%
• 1Y: 890.07%
• 3Y*: 154.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	85.49%	38.79%	26.31%	66.17%	-27.49%	0.03%
SMH3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities	305.05%	62.22%	69.91%	243.35%	-83.36%	2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGB.L and SMH3.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021	0.90

The correlation between SMGB.L and SMH3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMGB.L	SMH3.L
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGB.L

SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

SMH3.L

SMH3.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SMH3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SMH3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMGB.L	SMH3.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.58	9.62	-4.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.70	4.88	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.61	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.46	23.48	-9.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	50.72	75.37	-24.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.58, which is lower than the SMH3.L Sharpe Ratio of 9.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGB.L and SMH3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMGB.L	SMH3.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.58	9.62	-4.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.53	+0.72

Drawdowns

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum SMH3.L drawdown of -87.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and SMH3.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMGB.L	SMH3.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.24%	-87.38%	+51.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-37.52%	+25.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.24%	-84.61%	+48.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	-6.35%	+3.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.75%	-47.65%	+37.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	11.71%	-8.30%

Volatility

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) is 12.41%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a volatility of 38.87%. This indicates that SMGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMGB.L	SMH3.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.41%	38.87%	-26.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.93%	70.05%	-46.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.96%	91.61%	-60.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.45%	99.01%	-68.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.19%	99.01%	-68.82%

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMGB.L vs. SMH3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SMGB.L nor SMH3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.44%
SMH3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMGB.L and SMH3.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, SMGB.L and SMH3.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SMGB.L or SMH3.L?

On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMGB.L or SMH3.L?

SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SMH3.L.

What is the main difference between SMGB.L and SMH3.L?

SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while SMH3.L is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.75% for SMH3.L.