SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L
SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) and IUKD.L (iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUKD.L is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE UK Dividend+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMGB.L returned 39.09%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for IUKD.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IUKD.L.
Performance
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while IUKD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IUKD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 90.22% return, which is significantly higher than IUKD.L's 6.70% return.
SMGB.L
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 32.14%
- YTD
- 90.22%
- 6M
- 89.77%
- 1Y
- 183.52%
- 3Y*
- 58.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.09%
- 10Y*
- —
IUKD.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.13%
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 90.22% | 38.79% | 26.31% | 66.17% | -27.49% | 44.41% | 2.28% |
IUKD.L iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF | 6.70% | 32.12% | 12.27% | 5.81% | -1.44% | 23.43% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMGB.L and IUKD.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.30 |
The correlation between SMGB.L and IUKD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMGB.L
IUKD.L
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMGB.L
IUKD.L
-
Basic Materials
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Communication Services
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Consumer Cyclical
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Consumer Defensive
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Energy
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Financial Services
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Healthcare
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Industrials
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
-
Real Estate
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Utilities
SMGB.L
-
IUKD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMGB.L
IUKD.L
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMGB.L | IUKD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.92 | 2.11 | +3.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.94 | 2.86 | +3.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.39 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.28 | 2.38 | +12.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 53.62 | 8.64 | +44.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMGB.L | IUKD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.92 | 2.11 | +3.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.29 | 0.85 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.28 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum IUKD.L drawdown of -61.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and IUKD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMGB.L | IUKD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -61.95% | +25.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -9.92% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.24% | -10.52% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.24% | -19.93% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.86% | +3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -14.98% | +5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 2.74% | +0.67% |
Volatility
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L) at 4.03%. This indicates that SMGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUKD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMGB.L | IUKD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.24% | 4.03% | +8.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.74% | 9.32% | +14.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.94% | 11.21% | +19.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.43% | 13.83% | +16.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.18% | 17.22% | +12.96% |
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IUKD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Dividend Comparison
SMGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUKD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUKD.L iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF | 4.55% | 4.85% | 5.78% | 5.34% | 6.39% | 5.68% | 4.11% | 5.70% | 6.86% | 5.19% | 4.87% | 5.67% |
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMGB.L and IUKD.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IUKD.L.
SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while IUKD.L is Dividend. SMGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUKD.L tracks FTSE UK Dividend+ Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.40% for IUKD.L.
Find the right allocation for SMGB.L and IUKD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer