PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while IUKD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IUKD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 90.22% return, which is significantly higher than IUKD.L's 6.70% return.


SMGB.L

1D
2.23%
1M
32.14%
YTD
90.22%
6M
89.77%
1Y
183.52%
3Y*
58.17%
5Y*
39.09%
10Y*

IUKD.L

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
6.70%
6M
9.60%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
7.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
90.22%38.79%26.31%66.17%-27.49%44.41%2.28%
IUKD.L
iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF
6.70%32.12%12.27%5.81%-1.44%23.43%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGB.L and IUKD.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.30

The correlation between SMGB.L and IUKD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMGB.L
IUKD.L

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.0%

Energy

-

10.0%

Financial Services

-

41.6%

Healthcare

-

2.5%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

7.8%

Technology

SMGB.L
100.0%
IUKD.L

-

Basic Materials

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
4.8%

Communication Services

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
15.0%

Energy

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
10.0%

Financial Services

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
41.6%

Healthcare

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
2.5%

Industrials

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L

-

Real Estate

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
7.8%

Utilities

SMGB.L

-

IUKD.L
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGB.L
SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IUKD.L
IUKD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IUKD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMGB.LIUKD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.92

2.11

+3.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.94

2.86

+3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.39

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

15.28

2.38

+12.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

53.62

8.64

+44.99

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.92, which is higher than the IUKD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGB.L and IUKD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMGB.LIUKD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.92

2.11

+3.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.29

0.85

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.28

+0.99

Drawdowns

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum IUKD.L drawdown of -61.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and IUKD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMGB.LIUKD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.24%

-61.95%

+25.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-9.92%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.24%

-10.52%

-25.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.24%

-19.93%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.86%

+3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-14.98%

+5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

2.74%

+0.67%

Volatility

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L) at 4.03%. This indicates that SMGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUKD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMGB.LIUKD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

4.03%

+8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.74%

9.32%

+14.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.94%

11.21%

+19.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.43%

13.83%

+16.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

17.22%

+12.96%

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IUKD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMGB.L vs. IUKD.L - Dividend Comparison

SMGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUKD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUKD.L
iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF
4.55%4.85%5.78%5.34%6.39%5.68%4.11%5.70%6.86%5.19%4.87%5.67%
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMGB.L and IUKD.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IUKD.L.

SMGB.L is categorized as Semiconductors, while IUKD.L is Dividend. SMGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUKD.L tracks FTSE UK Dividend+ Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMGB.L and 0.40% for IUKD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMGB.L and IUKD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer