SMGB.L vs. AMZN
SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index, while AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SMGB.L returned 38.58%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMGB.L vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMGB.L is traded in GBP, while AMZN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMZN values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMGB.L achieves a 87.48% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 3.88% return.
SMGB.L
- 1D
- 5.59%
- 1M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- 87.48%
- 6M
- 89.61%
- 1Y
- 168.08%
- 3Y*
- 55.48%
- 5Y*
- 38.58%
- 10Y*
- —
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -10.75%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
SMGB.L vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMGB.L VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 87.48% | 38.79% | 26.32% | 66.15% | -27.78% | 44.41% | -0.72% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.88% | -2.29% | 46.91% | 71.84% | -43.62% | 3.35% | 2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMGB.L and AMZN is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMGB.L vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
SMGB.L
AMZN
SMGB.L vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMGB.L | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.10 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.71 | 0.56 | +13.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.80 | 1.34 | +44.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMGB.L vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGB.L and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMGB.L | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.23% | -51.58% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -24.69% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.23% | -35.52% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | -50.27% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -12.67% | +11.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -11.46% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 10.20% | -6.62% |
Volatility
SMGB.L vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 7.40%. This indicates that SMGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMGB.L | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 7.40% | +6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.73% | 19.70% | +6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.29% | 29.81% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.70% | 34.71% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 32.56% | -2.16% |
Dividends
SMGB.L vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMGB.L nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMGB.L and AMZN have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SMGB.L and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer