PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMGAX vs. GRSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund (SMGAX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMGAX achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SMGAX has underperformed GRSPX with an annualized return of 6.54%, while GRSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.


SMGAX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.84%
YTD
3.67%
6M
4.01%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
6.54%

GRSPX

1D
1.23%
1M
3.34%
YTD
21.59%
6M
20.73%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMGAX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund
3.67%6.81%10.51%7.22%-8.22%20.32%-4.36%20.63%-3.37%9.89%
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
21.59%6.12%16.03%11.95%-8.62%26.89%3.81%20.84%-10.21%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SMGAX and GRSPX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between SMGAX and GRSPX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMGAX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMGAX
SMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GRSPX
GRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund (SMGAX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMGAXGRSPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.04

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

2.87

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.99

-1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.72

12.80

-4.08

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the GRSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMGAX and GRSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMGAXGRSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.04

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.70

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.70

-0.37

Drawdowns

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMGAX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than GRSPX's maximum drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMGAX and GRSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMGAXGRSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

-35.67%

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.56%

-7.97%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.61%

-19.33%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.82%

-19.33%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.04%

-35.07%

+5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-4.81%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

2.39%

-1.52%

Volatility

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund (SMGAX) is 1.14%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that SMGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMGAXGRSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

5.49%

-4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

11.74%

-8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

15.60%

-10.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.92%

15.57%

-7.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

15.36%

-5.40%

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMGAX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMGAX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison

SMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, more than GRSPX's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
7.73%9.40%7.14%6.84%8.04%7.69%2.39%7.89%11.05%9.63%6.81%5.34%
SMGAX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Allocation Fund
8.89%8.66%8.00%7.56%5.88%7.93%3.32%9.06%9.83%7.09%13.59%6.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMGAX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRSPX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to SMGAX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMGAX dropped -56.10% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.

GRSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMGAX and GRSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer