SMFG vs. FEPG.L
SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.) is a stock, while FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by HANetf. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMFG vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMFG achieves a 30.77% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -3.44% return.
SMFG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 18.62%
- YTD
- 30.77%
- 1Y
- 77.13%
- 3Y*
- 45.59%
- 5Y*
- 33.59%
- 10Y*
- 19.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.65%
FEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SMFG vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 30.77% | 21.26% |
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | -3.44% | 8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMFG and FEPG.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMFG vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMFG
FEPG.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMFG vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMFG | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMFG vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMFG drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMFG and FEPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMFG | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.26% | -35.75% | -41.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -28.16% | +22.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.80% | -20.83% | -26.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | — | — |
Volatility
SMFG vs. FEPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMFG | FEPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.34% | 45.69% | -16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.97% | 45.69% | -16.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 45.69% | -18.85% |
Dividends
SMFG vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison
SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than FEPG.L's 27.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF | 27.80% | 11.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 2.38% | 2.84% | 2.82% | 3.67% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 5.97% | 4.61% | 4.80% | 3.17% | 3.63% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMFG and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SMFG and FEPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer