SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L
SMEA.L (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and ESIN.L (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SMEA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ESIN.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMEA.L returned 10.14%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for ESIN.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMEA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIN.L.
Performance
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMEA.L is traded in GBp, while ESIN.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMEA.L achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than ESIN.L's 7.95% return.
SMEA.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
ESIN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMEA.L iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.71% | 25.88% | 3.68% | 13.36% | -3.48% | 7.02% |
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 7.95% | 31.04% | 9.74% | 24.40% | -11.34% | 9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMEA.L and ESIN.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SMEA.L and ESIN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Industrials
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Healthcare
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
-
Technology
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Consumer Defensive
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Consumer Cyclical
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Basic Materials
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Energy
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
-
Utilities
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
-
Communication Services
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
Real Estate
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SMEA.L
ESIN.L
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMEA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.19 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.31 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 4.64 | +1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMEA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.99 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.71 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.72 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMEA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than ESIN.L's maximum drawdown of -24.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMEA.L and ESIN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMEA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -24.82% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -14.11% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.46% | -16.55% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.76% | -24.82% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -3.57% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -5.41% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.99% | -1.03% |
Volatility
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) is 3.91%, while iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that SMEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMEA.L | ESIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 6.24% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 15.70% | -5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 18.73% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 18.41% | -4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 18.36% | -3.32% |
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMEA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIN.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMEA.L vs. ESIN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMEA.L nor ESIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMEA.L and ESIN.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMEA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMEA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIN.L.
SMEA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ESIN.L is Industrials Equities. SMEA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMEA.L and 0.18% for ESIN.L.
Find the right allocation for SMEA.L and ESIN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer