PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIN.L vs. NATO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ESIN.L
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc
2.26%31.04%9.74%10.50%
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
8.49%43.80%34.30%16.26%
Different Trading Currencies

ESIN.L is traded in GBP, while NATO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NATO.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than NATO.L's 4.02% return.


ESIN.L

1D
3.87%
1M
-6.77%
YTD
2.26%
6M
3.94%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
10Y*

NATO.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.20%
YTD
4.02%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIN.L
ESIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIN.LNATO.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.87

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.48

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.45

6.22

+0.23

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the NATO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIN.L and NATO.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIN.LNATO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

1.32

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between ESIN.L and NATO.L is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIN.L nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -24.82%, which is greater than NATO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and NATO.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIN.LNATO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.82%

-21.84%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-12.79%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.65%

-6.04%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-2.45%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

4.68%

-1.12%

Volatility

ESIN.L vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) at 6.44%. This indicates that ESIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NATO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESIN.LNATO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

6.44%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

15.03%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

21.15%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

27.25%

-9.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

27.25%

-9.15%