PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDX vs. SCDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDX vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 22.66% return.


SMDX

1D
-0.32%
1M
2.07%
YTD
13.72%
6M
13.55%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCDS

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.01%
YTD
22.66%
6M
21.54%
1Y
42.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDX vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMDX and SCDS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025

0.88

The correlation between SMDX and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDX vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDX
SMDX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCDS
SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDX vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMDXSCDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

4.84

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.40

16.84

-5.44

SMDX vs. SCDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the SCDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDX and SCDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMDXSCDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.36

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.11

-0.01

Drawdowns

SMDX vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDX drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDX and SCDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDXSCDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-26.71%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-8.85%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.76%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-5.28%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.54%

-0.05%

Volatility

SMDX vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) is 4.26%, while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that SMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDXSCDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.58%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

12.93%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

18.20%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

21.20%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

21.20%

-0.01%

SMDX vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDX vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison

SMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SCDS's 0.92% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SMDX and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCDS has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to SMDX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDX dropped -14.52% vs SCDS's -26.71%.

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 42.67% vs 28.25% for SMDX. On fees, SMDX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMDX has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 42.67% return vs 28.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMDX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.

SCDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.53% for SMDX.

They also come from different issuers: Intech and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMDX and 0.40% for SCDS.

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDX and SCDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer