PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDIX vs. QCGDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDIX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly lower than QCGDX's 18.04% return.


SMDIX

1D
1.15%
1M
3.44%
YTD
15.46%
6M
16.00%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.81%

QCGDX

1D
1.49%
1M
2.01%
YTD
18.04%
6M
18.70%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SMDIX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund
15.46%7.45%15.41%12.69%-12.44%26.06%9.17%0.25%
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
18.04%1.02%9.87%14.74%-12.23%32.19%14.65%0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SMDIX and QCGDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.81

The correlation between SMDIX and QCGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDIX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDIX
SMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QCGDX
QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMDIXQCGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

4.17

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

15.31

-0.41

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDIX and QCGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMDIXQCGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.97

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.70

-0.17

Drawdowns

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDIX drawdown since its inception was -48.26%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDIX and QCGDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDIXQCGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.26%

-22.37%

-25.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-5.55%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

-16.10%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.87%

-20.18%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-6.13%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.52%

+0.39%

Volatility

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund (SMDIX) is 3.20%, while Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that SMDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDIXQCGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.50%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

9.22%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.63%

11.73%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

14.75%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

16.46%

+1.51%

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDIX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

SMDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than QCGDX's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCGDX
Quantified Common Ground Fund
0.59%0.69%4.42%0.22%0.00%5.44%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMDIX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund
8.54%9.86%8.53%1.69%3.28%15.04%0.32%0.91%2.45%1.51%1.72%11.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMDIX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCGDX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to SMDIX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDIX dropped -48.26% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.

SMDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDIX and QCGDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer