SMCZ vs. GLDY
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while GLDY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -89.94% vs 13.84% for GLDY. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GLDY.
Performance
SMCZ vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -90.14% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -2.30% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- 10.93%
- 1M
- -77.87%
- YTD
- -90.14%
- 6M
- -87.78%
- 1Y
- -89.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCZ vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -90.14% | -60.89% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -2.30% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and GLDY is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
GLDY
SMCZ vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCZ | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.16 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 1.03 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | 2.47 | -4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCZ | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 0.70 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.56 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and GLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -13.43% | -83.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.74% | -13.43% | -78.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.12% | -13.12% | -84.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -3.91% | -71.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.99% | 5.61% | +39.38% |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 80.07% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) at 4.56%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 80.07% | 4.56% | +75.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.65% | 18.27% | +113.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.87% | 19.87% | +137.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 19.58% | +143.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 19.58% | +143.81% |
SMCZ vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.59%, less than GLDY's 46.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 46.42% | 37.38% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 20.59% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and GLDY have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (80.07%) compared to GLDY (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs GLDY's -13.43%.
On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 13.84% vs -89.94% for SMCZ. On fees, GLDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GLDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 13.84% return vs -89.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 46.42%, compared with 20.59% for SMCZ.
SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GLDY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.99% for GLDY.
GLDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and GLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer