PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCY vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCY vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCY achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 15.43% return.


SMCY

1D
-3.83%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
-5.47%
6M
-12.25%
1Y
-30.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
0.55%
1M
1.13%
YTD
15.43%
6M
15.99%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCY vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMCY
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF
-5.47%-15.41%-33.36%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
15.43%14.96%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCY and QQQY is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024

0.54

The correlation between SMCY and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCY vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCY
SMCY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SMCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCY vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMCYQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.38

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

2.68

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

10.96

-11.90

SMCY vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCY Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCY and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMCY vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCY drawdown since its inception was -64.75%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCY and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCYQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.75%

-19.05%

-45.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.43%

-11.14%

-49.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.43%

-3.41%

-51.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.05%

-2.92%

-34.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.47%

2.72%

+32.75%

Volatility

SMCY vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) has a higher volatility of 39.48% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 7.00%. This indicates that SMCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCYQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.48%

7.00%

+32.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.75%

12.87%

+52.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.14%

14.92%

+56.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.26%

15.12%

+65.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.26%

15.12%

+65.14%

SMCY vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMCY and QQQY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

SMCY vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 210.02%, more than QQQY's 35.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
35.39%45.34%83.34%20.64%
SMCY
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF
210.02%231.43%38.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCY and QQQY have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCY has higher volatility (39.48%) compared to QQQY (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCY dropped -64.75% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 30.96% vs -30.54% for SMCY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 30.96% return vs -30.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMCY and QQQY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 210.02%, compared with 35.39% for QQQY.

SMCY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCY and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer