PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCY vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCY achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -47.76% return.


SMCY

1D
-2.02%
1M
-14.96%
YTD
-2.36%
6M
-5.19%
1Y
-33.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTW

1D
-6.48%
1M
-25.95%
YTD
-47.76%
6M
-53.14%
1Y
-35.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SMCY
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF
-2.36%-41.58%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-47.76%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCY and PLTW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCY
SMCY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SMCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMCYPLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.94

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.62

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

-1.28

+0.35

SMCY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCY Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMCY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCY drawdown since its inception was -64.75%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCY and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCYPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.75%

-57.27%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.43%

-57.27%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.93%

-57.27%

+4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-23.54%

-13.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.46%

27.70%

+8.76%

Volatility

SMCY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) has a higher volatility of 41.21% compared to PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) at 23.90%. This indicates that SMCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCYPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.21%

23.90%

+17.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.11%

46.84%

+20.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.15%

61.88%

+10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.50%

74.35%

+6.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.50%

74.35%

+6.15%

SMCY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMCY and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

SMCY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 211.43%, more than PLTW's 168.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
168.25%72.40%0.00%
SMCY
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF
211.43%231.43%38.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCY has higher volatility (41.21%) compared to PLTW (23.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCY dropped -64.75% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

On 1-year performance, SMCY leads with -33.89% vs -35.40% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTW has been the lower-risk option at 23.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMCY has performed better with a -33.89% return vs -35.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMCY and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 211.43%, compared with 168.25% for PLTW.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.

SMCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCY and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer