SMCY vs. PLTW
SMCY (YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCY returned -33.89% vs -35.40% for PLTW. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
SMCY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCY achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -47.76% return.
SMCY
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -14.96%
- YTD
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -33.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW
- 1D
- -6.48%
- 1M
- -25.95%
- YTD
- -47.76%
- 6M
- -53.14%
- 1Y
- -35.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | -2.36% | -41.58% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -47.76% | 28.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCY and PLTW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
SMCY
PLTW
SMCY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCY | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.62 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -1.28 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCY drawdown since its inception was -64.75%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCY and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCY | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.75% | -57.27% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.43% | -57.27% | -3.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.93% | -57.27% | +4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -23.54% | -13.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.46% | 27.70% | +8.76% |
Volatility
SMCY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) has a higher volatility of 41.21% compared to PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) at 23.90%. This indicates that SMCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCY | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.21% | 23.90% | +17.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.11% | 46.84% | +20.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.15% | 61.88% | +10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.50% | 74.35% | +6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.50% | 74.35% | +6.15% |
SMCY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SMCY and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
SMCY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 211.43%, more than PLTW's 168.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 168.25% | 72.40% | 0.00% |
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | 211.43% | 231.43% | 38.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCY has higher volatility (41.21%) compared to PLTW (23.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCY dropped -64.75% vs PLTW's -57.27%.
On 1-year performance, SMCY leads with -33.89% vs -35.40% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTW has been the lower-risk option at 23.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMCY has performed better with a -33.89% return vs -35.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMCY and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 211.43%, compared with 168.25% for PLTW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
SMCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCY and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer