SMCY vs. PLTW

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SMCY (YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCY returned -46.56% vs -19.05% for PLTW. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

SMCY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCY achieves a -11.68% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -31.97% return.

SMCY

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: -7.62%
• 6M: -10.27%
• YTD: -11.68%
• 1Y: -46.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -1.39%
• 6M: -32.03%
• YTD: -31.97%
• 1Y: -19.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF	-11.68%	-41.58%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-31.97%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCY and PLTW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

SMCY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCY

SMCY Risk / Return Rank: 4
SMCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SMCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
SMCY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SMCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SMCY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 7
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMCY	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	-0.31	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	-0.05	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.99	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.33	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	-0.64	-0.58

SMCY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCY Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMCY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCY drawdown since its inception was -64.75%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCY and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCY	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.75%	-57.27%	-7.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.43%	-57.27%	-3.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.42%	-44.35%	-13.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.89%	-24.43%	-13.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.29%	29.71%	+8.58%

Volatility

SMCY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) has a higher volatility of 21.14% compared to PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) at 19.80%. This indicates that SMCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCY	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.14%	19.80%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	68.10%	48.02%	+20.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.60%	61.70%	+10.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.94%	73.91%	+6.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.94%	73.91%	+6.03%

SMCY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.49%, more than PLTW's 126.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	126.75%	72.40%	0.00%
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF	209.49%	231.43%	38.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCY and PLTW in my portfolio?

SMCY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCY or PLTW?

SMCY has higher volatility (21.14%) compared to PLTW (19.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCY dropped -64.75% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, SMCY or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -19.05% vs -46.56% for SMCY. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, PLTW has been the lower-risk option at 19.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCY or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -19.05% return vs -46.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCY or PLTW?

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SMCY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCY or PLTW?

SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 209.49%, compared with 126.75% for PLTW.

What is the main difference between SMCY and PLTW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SMCY and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.