SMCX vs. IFED
SMCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMCX is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. Over the past year, SMCX returned -60.96% vs 1.97% for IFED. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
SMCX vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCX achieves a 34.65% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -3.52% return.
SMCX
- 1D
- -10.89%
- 1M
- 157.98%
- YTD
- 34.65%
- 6M
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- -60.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCX vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF | 34.65% | -69.78% | -89.57% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.52% | 15.02% | 7.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCX and IFED is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCX vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
SMCX
IFED
SMCX vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF (SMCX) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.04 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 0.14 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 0.34 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 0.12 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.65 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
SMCX vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCX drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCX and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.02% | -22.36% | -76.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.75% | -14.65% | -80.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.87% | -5.50% | -90.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.27% | -5.84% | -81.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.77% | 5.75% | +62.02% |
Volatility
SMCX vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF (SMCX) has a higher volatility of 57.58% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.50%. This indicates that SMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 57.58% | 4.50% | +53.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 149.68% | 12.86% | +136.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 157.25% | 16.21% | +141.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.87% | 19.88% | +179.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.87% | 19.88% | +179.99% |
SMCX vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCX vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
SMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF | 3.26% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCX and IFED have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCX has higher volatility (57.58%) compared to IFED (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCX dropped -99.02% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 1-year performance, IFED leads with 1.97% vs -60.96% for SMCX. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFED has performed better with a 1.97% return vs -60.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCX.
SMCX has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCX and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCX and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer