SMCWX vs. SECUX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX).
SMCWX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Apr 30, 1990. SECUX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Sep 17, 1969.
Performance
SMCWX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMCWX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | -4.37% | 14.07% | 2.33% | 18.86% | -29.90% | 10.14% | 37.46% | 30.79% | -9.75% | 26.85% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | -1.69% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly lower than SECUX's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX has underperformed SECUX with an annualized return of 8.67%, while SECUX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.
SMCWX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -11.33%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
SECUX
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -3.52%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMCWX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMCWX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank
SMCWX
SECUX
SMCWX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCWX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 0.39 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 0.72 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.10 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 0.46 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 1.84 | +2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCWX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.39 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.14 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.46 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.25 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCWX and SECUX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SMCWX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison
SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | 5.07% | 4.84% | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 9.24% | 1.60% | 4.24% | 7.06% | 4.48% | 0.35% | 6.49% |
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
Drawdowns
SMCWX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and SECUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCWX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -71.68% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -12.94% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.79% | -37.80% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.79% | -38.56% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.13% | -10.07% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -18.49% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.26% | -0.23% |
Volatility
SMCWX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMCWX | SECUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 6.80% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 11.93% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 20.78% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 21.38% | -3.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 21.10% | -3.38% |