SECUX vs. RYOCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX).
SECUX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Sep 17, 1969. RYOCX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 1994.
Performance
SECUX vs. RYOCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SECUX vs. RYOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | -1.69% | 1.86% | 14.29% | 26.43% | -28.33% | 13.39% | 31.95% | 32.44% | -7.76% | 24.15% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | -9.21% | 19.51% | 24.34% | 53.31% | -33.34% | 25.85% | 46.80% | 40.33% | -1.36% | 31.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECUX achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly higher than RYOCX's -9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SECUX has underperformed RYOCX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while RYOCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.
SECUX
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- -3.52%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
RYOCX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SECUX vs. RYOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECUX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RYOCX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SECUX vs. RYOCX — Risk / Return Rank
SECUX
RYOCX
SECUX vs. RYOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) and Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECUX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.82 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 1.32 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 1.20 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 4.41 | -2.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECUX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.82 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.50 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.77 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.51 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between SECUX and RYOCX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SECUX vs. RYOCX - Dividend Comparison
SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECUX Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.31% | 41.48% | 6.54% | 14.34% | 2.18% | 27.68% | 12.89% | 0.59% | 14.34% |
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 4.71% | 4.28% | 7.23% | 0.00% | 8.82% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 3.80% | 1.86% | 6.00% | 1.75% | 2.03% |
Drawdowns
SECUX vs. RYOCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECUX drawdown since its inception was -71.68%, smaller than the maximum RYOCX drawdown of -83.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECUX and RYOCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECUX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.68% | -83.75% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -12.75% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.80% | -38.04% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.56% | -38.04% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.07% | -12.31% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -32.05% | +13.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.47% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SECUX vs. RYOCX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) at 5.40%. This indicates that SECUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SECUX | RYOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 5.40% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 12.43% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 22.54% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 22.75% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 22.55% | -1.45% |