SMCWX vs. QISIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SMCWX (American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A) and QISIX (Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SMCWX returned 2.66%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for QISIX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMCWX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for QISIX.

Performance

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a 15.85% return, which is significantly lower than QISIX's 20.85% return.

SMCWX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 15.85%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: 27.90%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: 2.66%
• 10Y*: 10.36%

QISIX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 6.24%
• YTD: 20.85%
• 6M: 21.03%
• 1Y: 27.78%
• 3Y*: 12.24%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A	15.85%	14.07%	2.33%	18.86%	-29.90%	10.14%	37.46%	18.77%
QISIX Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund	20.85%	18.14%	-5.09%	16.38%	-19.17%	3.48%	13.72%	18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCWX and QISIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019	0.56

The correlation between SMCWX and QISIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SMCWX vs. QISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCWX

SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 40
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

QISIX

QISIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
QISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
QISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
QISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMCWX	QISIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.94	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.93	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	2.52	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	8.42	+0.85

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the QISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCWX and QISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than QISIX's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and QISIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCWX	QISIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.46%	-41.11%	-21.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.83%	-10.48%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.40%	-15.47%	-5.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.79%	-37.79%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.31%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.90%	-12.02%	-2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	3.13%	-0.16%

Volatility

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX) at 5.02%. This indicates that SMCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCWX	QISIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	5.02%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.95%	11.60%	+2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	13.67%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.37%	14.99%	+3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	16.05%	+1.92%

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than QISIX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCWX vs. QISIX - Dividend Comparison

SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than QISIX's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QISIX Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund	1.56%	1.89%	3.29%	1.27%	1.66%	2.52%	0.68%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A	4.15%	4.84%	0.60%	0.64%	0.00%	9.24%	1.60%	4.24%	7.06%	4.48%	0.35%	6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCWX and QISIX in my portfolio?

SMCWX and QISIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCWX or QISIX?

SMCWX has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to QISIX (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCWX dropped -62.46% vs QISIX's -41.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.