SMCWX vs. CWBFX
SMCWX (American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A) and CWBFX (American Funds Capital World Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SMCWX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by American Funds, while CWBFX is a Global Bonds fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX returned 9.88%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for CWBFX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCWX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CWBFX.
Performance
SMCWX vs. CWBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than CWBFX's -1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX has outperformed CWBFX with an annualized return of 9.88%, while CWBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.05% annualized return.
SMCWX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
CWBFX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 0.78%
- 3Y*
- 1.72%
- 5Y*
- -2.68%
- 10Y*
- 0.05%
SMCWX vs. CWBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | 12.63% | 14.07% | 2.33% | 18.86% | -29.90% | 10.14% | 37.46% | 30.79% | -9.75% | 26.85% |
CWBFX American Funds Capital World Bond Fund | -1.63% | 7.78% | -3.25% | 5.81% | -17.52% | -5.17% | 9.91% | 7.66% | -1.81% | 7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCWX and CWBFX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1990 | 0.17 |
Over the past year, SMCWX and CWBFX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCWX vs. CWBFX — Risk / Return Rank
SMCWX
CWBFX
SMCWX vs. CWBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCWX | CWBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.02 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 0.08 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 0.19 | +6.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCWX vs. CWBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than CWBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and CWBFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCWX | CWBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -27.91% | -34.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -4.45% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -7.69% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.79% | -26.34% | -13.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.79% | -27.91% | -11.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -15.33% | +11.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -4.22% | -10.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.83% | +1.20% |
Volatility
SMCWX vs. CWBFX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to American Funds Capital World Bond Fund (CWBFX) at 1.26%. This indicates that SMCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CWBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCWX | CWBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 1.26% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 4.02% | +10.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 4.96% | +12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 6.59% | +11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 5.65% | +12.25% |
SMCWX vs. CWBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CWBFX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCWX vs. CWBFX - Dividend Comparison
SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than CWBFX's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWBFX American Funds Capital World Bond Fund | 3.82% | 2.68% | 3.01% | 2.47% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 3.18% | 2.26% | 1.87% | 1.80% | 2.05% | 0.58% |
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | 4.27% | 4.84% | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 9.24% | 1.60% | 4.24% | 7.06% | 4.48% | 0.35% | 6.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCWX and CWBFX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCWX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to CWBFX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCWX dropped -62.46% vs CWBFX's -27.91%.
SMCWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCWX and CWBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer