PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCP vs. SCDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCP vs. SCDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMCP

1D
-0.30%
1M
-25.99%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCDV

1D
0.31%
1M
0.18%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.22%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCP vs. SCDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMCP and SCDV is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCP vs. SCDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCP

SCDV
SCDV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SCDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCDV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SCDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCP vs. SCDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMCP vs. SCDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCPSCDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.43

0.24

-1.67

Drawdowns

SMCP vs. SCDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, which is greater than SCDV's maximum drawdown of -22.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and SCDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCPSCDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.86%

-22.84%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-3.88%

-22.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-5.55%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

Volatility

SMCP vs. SCDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCPSCDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.62%

15.59%

+28.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.62%

19.19%

+24.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.62%

19.19%

+24.43%

SMCP vs. SCDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDV's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCP vs. SCDV - Dividend Comparison

SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


PositionTTM20252024
SCDV
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
0.52%0.61%0.05%
SMCP
AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCP and SCDV have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCDV is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCDV is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.

SCDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.

They also come from different issuers: AlphaMark Advisors and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SMCP and 0.70% for SCDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCP and SCDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer