SMCP vs. SCDV
SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) and SCDV (Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMCP is passively managed, while SCDV is actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SCDV.
Performance
SMCP vs. SCDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMCP
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -25.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 14.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCP vs. SCDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | -25.99% |
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCP and SCDV is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCP vs. SCDV — Risk / Return Rank
SMCP
SCDV
SMCP vs. SCDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCP | SCDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.43 | 0.24 | -1.67 |
Drawdowns
SMCP vs. SCDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, which is greater than SCDV's maximum drawdown of -22.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and SCDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCP | SCDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -22.84% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | -3.88% | -22.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -5.55% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.71% | — |
Volatility
SMCP vs. SCDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCP | SCDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.62% | 15.59% | +28.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.62% | 19.19% | +24.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.62% | 19.19% | +24.43% |
SMCP vs. SCDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDV's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCP vs. SCDV - Dividend Comparison
SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCDV Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF | 0.52% | 0.61% | 0.05% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCP and SCDV have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCDV is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCDV is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.
SCDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.
They also come from different issuers: AlphaMark Advisors and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SMCP and 0.70% for SCDV.
Find the right allocation for SMCP and SCDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer