SMCO vs. USMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SMCO (Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. SMCO is actively managed, while USMF is passively managed. Over the past year, SMCO returned 21.01% vs 6.87% for USMF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMCO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.

Performance

SMCO vs. USMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCO achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 4.51% return.

SMCO

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 6M: 10.74%
• 1Y: 21.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USMF

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 4.51%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 6.87%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: 7.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCO vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMCO Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF	12.19%	6.46%	17.78%	7.03%
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund	4.51%	4.60%	19.65%	5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCO and USMF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2023	0.79

The correlation between SMCO and USMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMCO vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCO

SMCO Risk / Return Rank: 43
SMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 48

USMF

USMF Risk / Return Rank: 20
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 17
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCO vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMCO	USMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	0.60	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	0.92	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.11	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	1.07	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.41	3.16	+4.25

SMCO vs. USMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCO Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the USMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCO and USMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMCO vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCO drawdown since its inception was -22.71%, smaller than the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCO and USMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCO	USMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.71%	-36.24%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.56%	-6.47%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-2.01%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.69%	-4.14%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	2.18%	+0.66%

Volatility

SMCO vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) is 4.64%, while WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that SMCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCO	USMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	4.95%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	8.55%	+3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	11.56%	+4.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.21%	14.35%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	16.98%	+1.23%

SMCO vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCO vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison

SMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than USMF's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMCO Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF	0.90%	1.01%	0.47%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund	1.31%	1.37%	1.22%	1.33%	1.74%	1.42%	1.34%	1.38%	1.45%	0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCO and USMF in my portfolio?

SMCO and USMF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCO or USMF?

USMF has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to SMCO (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCO dropped -22.71% vs USMF's -36.24%.

Which ETF is better, SMCO or USMF?

On 1-year performance, SMCO leads with 21.01% vs 6.87% for USMF. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SMCO has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCO or USMF?

Over the 1-year period, SMCO has performed better with a 21.01% return vs 6.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCO or USMF?

USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SMCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCO or USMF?

USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.90% for SMCO.

What is the main difference between SMCO and USMF?

They also come from different issuers: Hilton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SMCO and 0.28% for USMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.