PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCIX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCIX achieves a 16.24% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCIX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.


SMCIX

1D
0.91%
1M
2.79%
YTD
16.24%
6M
15.02%
1Y
31.79%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
11.15%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCIX
Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund
16.24%6.90%18.13%15.48%-16.41%26.53%11.27%30.68%-9.07%3.08%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCIX and NASDX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2000

0.75

The correlation between SMCIX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCIX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCIX
SMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCIXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.65

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.92

14.16

-1.24

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCIX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCIXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.70

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.89

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

1.00

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.33

+0.08

Drawdowns

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCIX drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCIX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCIXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.13%

-83.16%

+25.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-11.90%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.52%

-22.71%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-35.33%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.54%

-35.33%

-7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-34.37%

+24.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

3.06%

-0.43%

Volatility

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCIXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.51%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

12.19%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

16.10%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

23.06%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

22.68%

+0.95%

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCIX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

SMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, more than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%
SMCIX
Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund
8.04%10.78%19.88%3.48%10.40%9.40%4.53%13.88%9.39%1.63%4.64%11.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCIX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCIX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to NASDX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCIX dropped -58.13% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCIX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer