SMCI vs. TQQQ
SMCI (Super Micro Computer, Inc.) is a stock, while TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, SMCI returned 32.81%/yr vs 43.95%/yr for TQQQ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMCI vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCI achieves a 50.29% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 44.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCI has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 32.81%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 43.95% annualized return.
SMCI
- 1D
- 5.64%
- 1M
- 24.37%
- YTD
- 50.29%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 64.69%
- 10Y*
- 32.81%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 44.91%
- 6M
- 37.12%
- 1Y
- 106.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.78%
- 5Y*
- 24.89%
- 10Y*
- 43.95%
SMCI vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 50.29% | -3.97% | 7.23% | 246.24% | 86.80% | 38.82% | 31.81% | 74.06% | -34.07% | -25.38% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 44.91% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCI and TQQQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SMCI and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCI vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SMCI
TQQQ
SMCI vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCI | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.33 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 2.91 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 9.45 | -9.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCI | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 2.16 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.37 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.67 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.72 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
SMCI vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCI drawdown since its inception was -84.84%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCI and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCI | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.84% | -81.66% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.18% | -36.97% | -29.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.84% | -58.04% | -26.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.84% | -81.66% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.84% | -81.66% | -3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.97% | -12.55% | -50.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -18.52% | -13.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.91% | 11.36% | +27.55% |
Volatility
SMCI vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) has a higher volatility of 26.36% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 20.84%. This indicates that SMCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCI | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.36% | 20.84% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.65% | 39.54% | +28.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.63% | 49.94% | +29.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.44% | 66.84% | +18.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.55% | 66.15% | +4.40% |
Dividends
SMCI vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SMCI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.41% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCI and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCI has higher volatility (26.36%) compared to TQQQ (20.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCI dropped -84.84% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCI and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer