PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCF vs. CZAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMCF vs. CZAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMCF vs. CZAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
6.42%9.56%16.30%4.47%
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
-4.66%13.32%10.92%2.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCF achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than CZAR's -4.66% return.


SMCF

1D
1.46%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
6.42%
6M
8.57%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CZAR

1D
1.90%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-4.66%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMCF vs. CZAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CZAR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMCF vs. CZAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCF
SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CZAR
CZAR Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CZAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CZAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCF vs. CZAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCFCZARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.35

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

0.60

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.08

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.54

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

1.93

+4.23

SMCF vs. CZAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the CZAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCF and CZAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCFCZARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.35

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.61

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SMCF and CZAR is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SMCF vs. CZAR - Dividend Comparison

SMCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than CZAR's 1.54% yield.


TTM20252024
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
3.68%3.91%0.61%
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
1.54%1.47%0.94%

Drawdowns

SMCF vs. CZAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCF drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than CZAR's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCF and CZAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCFCZARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-13.38%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.56%

-10.29%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-7.30%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-2.06%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

2.87%

+1.30%

Volatility

SMCF vs. CZAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) is 4.02%, while Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that SMCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CZAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMCFCZARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

4.80%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

9.72%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.41%

15.91%

+7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

15.26%

+5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

15.26%

+5.58%