SMCF vs. CZAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) and CZAR (Themes Natural Monopoly ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCF is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CZAR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Natural Monopoly Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMCF returned 32.87% vs 2.67% for CZAR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CZAR.

Performance

SMCF vs. CZAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCF achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly higher than CZAR's -1.18% return.

SMCF

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 13.63%
• 1Y: 32.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CZAR

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: -1.18%
• 6M: -0.33%
• 1Y: 2.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCF vs. CZAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	13.75%	9.56%	16.30%	4.47%
CZAR Themes Natural Monopoly ETF	-1.18%	13.32%	10.92%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCF and CZAR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023	0.61

The correlation between SMCF and CZAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMCF vs. CZAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMCF	CZAR
Financial Services	50.0%	17.0%
Energy	18.2%	3.9%
Technology	11.0%	20.9%
Industrials	9.8%	27.3%
Healthcare	4.4%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	6.1%
Communication Services	1.5%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	5.8%
Basic Materials	0.6%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Utilities	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

SMCF vs. CZAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCF

SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 67
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CZAR

CZAR Risk / Return Rank: 12
CZAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
CZAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CZAR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
CZAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CZAR Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCF vs. CZAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMCF	CZAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	0.22	+1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	0.39	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.05	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.63	0.28	+4.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.46	0.88	+11.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMCF vs. CZAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the CZAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCF and CZAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCF	CZAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	0.22	+1.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.68	+0.22

Drawdowns

SMCF vs. CZAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCF drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than CZAR's maximum drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCF and CZAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCF	CZAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.48%	-13.38%	-15.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-9.54%	+2.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-3.92%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.29%	-2.18%	-3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	3.05%	-0.40%

Volatility

SMCF vs. CZAR - Volatility Comparison

Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) at 3.12%. This indicates that SMCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CZAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCF	CZAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	3.12%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.00%	9.85%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.18%	12.24%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.31%	15.04%	+5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.31%	15.04%	+5.27%

SMCF vs. CZAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CZAR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCF vs. CZAR - Dividend Comparison

SMCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than CZAR's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CZAR Themes Natural Monopoly ETF	1.49%	1.47%	0.94%
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	3.44%	3.91%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCF and CZAR in my portfolio?

SMCF and CZAR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCF or CZAR?

SMCF has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to CZAR (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCF dropped -28.48% vs CZAR's -13.38%.

Which ETF is better, SMCF or CZAR?

On 1-year performance, SMCF leads with 32.87% vs 2.67% for CZAR. On fees, SMCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CZAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCF or CZAR?

Over the 1-year period, SMCF has performed better with a 32.87% return vs 2.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCF or CZAR?

SMCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CZAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCF or CZAR?

SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.49% for CZAR.

What is the main difference between SMCF and CZAR?

SMCF is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while CZAR is Large Cap Blend Equities. SMCF tracks Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CZAR tracks Solactive Natural Monopoly Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SMCF and 0.35% for CZAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.