SMCF vs. BSMW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCF is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMCF returned 35.72% vs 6.54% for BSMW. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.

Performance

SMCF vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCF achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.28% return.

SMCF

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 14.89%
• 1Y: 35.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMW

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCF vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	15.16%	9.56%	16.30%	4.47%
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	1.28%	3.42%	-0.35%	1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCF and BSMW is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023	0.04

SMCF vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMCF	BSMW
Financial Services	50.0%	1.7%
Energy	18.2%	-
Technology	11.0%	0.1%
Industrials	9.8%	-
Healthcare	4.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	0.3%
Communication Services	1.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMCF vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCF

SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 74
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BSMW

BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 64
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCF vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMCF	BSMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.35	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.37	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.03	2.25	+2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.54	7.09	+6.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMCF vs. BSMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCF Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the BSMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCF and BSMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCF	BSMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.35	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.69	+0.24

Drawdowns

SMCF vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCF drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCF and BSMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCF	BSMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.48%	-7.57%	-20.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-2.92%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-1.00%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-1.72%	-3.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	0.92%	+1.73%

Volatility

SMCF vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison

Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.92%. This indicates that SMCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCF	BSMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	0.92%	+2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.06%	1.97%	+8.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	2.81%	+13.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.31%	5.00%	+15.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.31%	5.00%	+15.31%

SMCF vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCF vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison

SMCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than BSMW's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF	3.20%	3.24%	3.48%	2.36%
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF	3.40%	3.91%	0.61%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCF and BSMW in my portfolio?

SMCF and BSMW have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCF or BSMW?

SMCF has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to BSMW (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCF dropped -28.48% vs BSMW's -7.57%.

Which ETF is better, SMCF or BSMW?

On 1-year performance, SMCF leads with 35.72% vs 6.54% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMCF or BSMW?

Over the 1-year period, SMCF has performed better with a 35.72% return vs 6.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMCF or BSMW?

BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SMCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMCF or BSMW?

SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 3.20% for BSMW.

What is the main difference between SMCF and BSMW?

SMCF is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. SMCF tracks Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SMCF and 0.18% for BSMW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.