SMCC vs. MST
SMCC (Defiance Leveraged Long + Income SMCI ETF) and MST (Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Defiance. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCC charges 1.51%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for MST.
Performance
SMCC vs. MST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCC achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly higher than MST's -52.16% return.
SMCC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- -21.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MST
- 1D
- -12.92%
- 1M
- -57.62%
- YTD
- -52.16%
- 6M
- -64.10%
- 1Y
- -93.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCC vs. MST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCC Defiance Leveraged Long + Income SMCI ETF | 5.60% | -57.43% |
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | -52.16% | -81.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCC and MST is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCC vs. MST — Risk / Return Rank
SMCC
MST
SMCC vs. MST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long + Income SMCI ETF (SMCC) and Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF (MST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCC | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | -0.75 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SMCC vs. MST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCC drawdown since its inception was -75.87%, smaller than the maximum MST drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCC and MST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCC | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.87% | -94.99% | +19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -94.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.90% | -94.90% | +22.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.60% | -62.46% | +8.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 72.81% | — |
Volatility
SMCC vs. MST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCC | MST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 101.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.90% | 127.04% | -51.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.90% | 124.04% | -48.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.90% | 124.04% | -48.14% |
SMCC vs. MST - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCC has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than MST's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCC vs. MST - Dividend Comparison
SMCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.22%, less than MST's 939.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MST Defiance Leveraged Long Income MSTR ETF | 939.88% | 381.22% |
SMCC Defiance Leveraged Long + Income SMCI ETF | 83.22% | 79.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCC and MST have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MST is cheaper at 1.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MST is cheaper with a 1.31% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for SMCC.
MST has the higher dividend yield at 939.88%, compared with 83.22% for SMCC.
Their fees differ too: 1.51% for SMCC and 1.31% for MST.
Find the right allocation for SMCC and MST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer