PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMBS vs. VGSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMBS vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMBS achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than VGSH's 0.48% return.


SMBS

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.82%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGSH

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.74%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMBS vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.70%8.15%-0.07%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.48%5.07%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SMBS and VGSH is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024

0.76

The correlation between SMBS and VGSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMBS vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMBS
SMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMBS vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMBSVGSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

2.68

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

4.43

-2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.57

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.90

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.21

15.52

-7.30

SMBS vs. VGSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the VGSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMBS and VGSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMBSVGSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

2.68

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.01

+0.17

Drawdowns

SMBS vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMBS drawdown since its inception was -3.20%, smaller than the maximum VGSH drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBS and VGSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMBSVGSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-5.70%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-0.88%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.29%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-0.60%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.22%

+0.61%

Volatility

SMBS vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.35%. This indicates that SMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMBSVGSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

0.35%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

0.88%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

1.29%

+2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.86%

1.97%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

1.57%

+3.29%

SMBS vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMBS and VGSH have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMBS vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison

SMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than VGSH's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.17%4.83%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.87%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMBS and VGSH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMBS has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to VGSH (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMBS dropped -3.20% vs VGSH's -5.70%.

On 1-year performance, SMBS leads with 6.78% vs 3.43% for VGSH. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, VGSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMBS has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMBS and VGSH have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 3.87% for VGSH.

SMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while VGSH is Government Bonds. SMBS tracks Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index, while VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard.

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMBS and VGSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer