SMBS vs. FTSD
SMBS (Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. SMBS is passively managed, while FTSD is actively managed. Over the past year, SMBS returned 6.78% vs 4.31% for FTSD. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMBS charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.
Performance
SMBS vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMBS achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than FTSD's 0.80% return.
SMBS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
SMBS vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.70% | 8.15% | -0.07% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.80% | 5.66% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMBS and FTSD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMBS vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
SMBS
FTSD
SMBS vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMBS | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.64 | 3.30 | -1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.42 | 5.27 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.69 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 9.59 | -7.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | 38.36 | -30.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMBS | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.64 | 3.30 | -1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 1.04 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
SMBS vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMBS drawdown since its inception was -3.20%, smaller than the maximum FTSD drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBS and FTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMBS | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -5.32% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -0.45% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.12% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -0.60% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.11% | +0.72% |
Volatility
SMBS vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that SMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMBS | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 0.51% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 1.03% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 1.31% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 1.85% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 1.79% | +3.07% |
SMBS vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMBS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMBS vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
SMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than FTSD's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.50% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.17% | 4.83% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMBS and FTSD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMBS has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMBS dropped -3.20% vs FTSD's -5.32%.
On 1-year performance, SMBS leads with 6.78% vs 4.31% for FTSD. On fees, SMBS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMBS has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMBS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FTSD.
SMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 4.50% for FTSD.
They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SMBS and 0.25% for FTSD.
FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMBS and FTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer