PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMBPX vs. TRBUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (TRBUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SMBPX has underperformed TRBUX with an annualized return of -0.15%, while TRBUX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.31% annualized return.


SMBPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
-0.15%

TRBUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.58%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
6.82%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
3.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.00%2.92%-0.11%1.84%-2.57%-1.39%0.77%1.00%-2.38%2.12%
TRBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
1.59%6.88%7.88%6.99%-1.28%0.22%3.11%3.60%1.88%1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SMBPX and TRBUX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMBPX vs. TRBUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMBPX
SMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBUX
TRBUX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TRBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (TRBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMBPXTRBUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.15

3.90

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.26

10.21

-3.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.24

4.18

-1.94

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

16.93

-10.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.19

65.96

-50.78

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMBPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is comparable to the TRBUX Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMBPX and TRBUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMBPXTRBUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

3.90

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

2.60

-2.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

2.21

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.96

-1.08

Drawdowns

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMBPX drawdown since its inception was -9.99%, which is greater than TRBUX's maximum drawdown of -4.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBPX and TRBUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMBPXTRBUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-4.15%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.69%

-0.39%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.48%

-0.78%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.52%

-2.68%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.99%

-4.15%

-5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

0.00%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-0.21%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.10%

+0.18%

Volatility

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) is 0.00%, while T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (TRBUX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that SMBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMBPXTRBUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

0.68%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

1.18%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43%

1.71%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

1.68%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.96%

1.50%

+0.46%

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMBPX has a 3.16% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBUX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMBPX vs. TRBUX - Dividend Comparison

SMBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than TRBUX's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.69%2.69%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.10%0.10%0.36%0.23%4.23%1.50%
TRBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
6.03%6.23%6.36%4.48%1.53%1.21%1.86%2.73%2.47%1.62%1.18%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMBPX and TRBUX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBUX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMBPX dropped -9.99% vs TRBUX's -4.15%.

TRBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 3.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMBPX and TRBUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer