SMBPX vs. DFYGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SMBPX (Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio) and DFYGX (DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, SMBPX returned -0.15%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for DFYGX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMBPX charges 3.16%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DFYGX.

Performance

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) and DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SMBPX has underperformed DFYGX with an annualized return of -0.15%, while DFYGX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.43% annualized return.

SMBPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -0.23%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 1.73%
• 5Y*: 0.17%
• 10Y*: -0.15%

DFYGX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 3.92%
• 5Y*: 1.99%
• 10Y*: 1.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio	0.00%	2.92%	-0.11%	1.84%	-2.57%	-1.39%	0.77%	1.00%	-2.38%	2.12%
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	1.41%	2.16%	5.15%	5.00%	-3.02%	-0.51%	0.38%	2.20%	1.42%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SMBPX and DFYGX is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 1996	0.22

The correlation between SMBPX and DFYGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SMBPX vs. DFYGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMBPX

SMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

DFYGX

DFYGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
DFYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DFYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
DFYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DFYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DFYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) and DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMBPX	DFYGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	2.20	+0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.57	2.55	+3.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.09	2.61	-0.52
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.52	2.63	+3.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.86	9.52	+6.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMBPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the DFYGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMBPX and DFYGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMBPX	DFYGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	2.20	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	1.62	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	1.44	-1.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	1.85	-0.97

Drawdowns

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMBPX drawdown since its inception was -9.99%, which is greater than DFYGX's maximum drawdown of -4.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBPX and DFYGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMBPX	DFYGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.99%	-4.46%	-5.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.69%	-1.04%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.48%	-1.04%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.52%	-4.36%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.99%	-4.46%	-5.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.99%	-0.10%	-2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-0.30%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.28%	0.29%	-0.01%

Volatility

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) is 0.00%, while DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio (DFYGX) has a volatility of 0.34%. This indicates that SMBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFYGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMBPX	DFYGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	0.34%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.39%	0.54%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43%	1.27%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.21%	1.24%	+0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.96%	1.00%	+0.96%

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMBPX has a 3.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DFYGX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMBPX vs. DFYGX - Dividend Comparison

SMBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than DFYGX's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFYGX DFA Two-Year Government Portfolio	2.80%	2.04%	4.84%	3.07%	1.14%	0.00%	0.27%	1.87%	1.82%	1.01%	0.58%	0.49%
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.69%	2.69%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.10%	0.10%	0.36%	0.23%	4.23%	1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMBPX and DFYGX in my portfolio?

SMBPX and DFYGX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMBPX or DFYGX?

DFYGX has higher volatility (0.34%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMBPX dropped -9.99% vs DFYGX's -4.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.