PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMBPX vs. DFIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) and DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SMBPX has underperformed DFIHX with an annualized return of -0.15%, while DFIHX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.


SMBPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
-0.15%

DFIHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.83%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.00%2.92%-0.11%1.84%-2.57%-1.39%0.77%1.00%-2.38%2.12%
DFIHX
DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio
1.52%3.41%5.41%4.98%-1.19%-0.19%0.62%2.44%1.87%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SMBPX and DFIHX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.17

The correlation between SMBPX and DFIHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMBPX vs. DFIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMBPX
SMBPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIHX
DFIHX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DFIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) and DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMBPXDFIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.24

7.53

-5.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

9.49

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

57.84

-42.66

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMBPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is lower than the DFIHX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMBPX and DFIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMBPXDFIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

5.17

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

2.78

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

2.50

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.52

-0.64

Drawdowns

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMBPX drawdown since its inception was -9.99%, which is greater than DFIHX's maximum drawdown of -2.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBPX and DFIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMBPXDFIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-2.53%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.69%

-0.39%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.48%

-0.49%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.52%

-2.26%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.99%

-2.26%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

0.00%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-0.15%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.06%

+0.22%

Volatility

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) is 0.00%, while DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX) has a volatility of 0.16%. This indicates that SMBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMBPXDFIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

0.16%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.39%

0.43%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43%

0.72%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

1.00%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.96%

0.80%

+1.16%

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMBPX has a 3.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIHX's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMBPX vs. DFIHX - Dividend Comparison

SMBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than DFIHX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIHX
DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio
3.58%3.26%4.99%3.37%1.07%0.00%0.62%2.12%1.85%1.13%0.66%0.51%
SMBPX
Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.69%2.69%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.10%0.10%0.36%0.23%4.23%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMBPX and DFIHX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIHX has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMBPX dropped -9.99% vs DFIHX's -2.53%.

DFIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 3.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMBPX and DFIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer