PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAX vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAX vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMAX achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 12.64% return.


SMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.93%
6M
2.84%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KAPR

1D
0.20%
1M
1.33%
YTD
12.64%
6M
12.20%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAX vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
2.93%8.01%1.06%
KAPR
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April
12.64%7.42%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAX and KAPR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

0.68

The correlation between SMAX and KAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAX vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAX vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMAXKAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.74

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

9.28

-5.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.55

43.52

-20.97

SMAX vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMAX and KAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMAX vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMAX drawdown since its inception was -3.90%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAX and KAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAXKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-16.91%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-2.52%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.10%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-3.88%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.54%

-0.18%

Volatility

SMAX vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) is 0.76%, while Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that SMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAXKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

2.46%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

4.57%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69%

6.66%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

11.76%

-8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.64%

11.64%

-8.00%

SMAX vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMAX vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while KAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
KAPR
Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
0.95%0.98%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMAX and KAPR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KAPR has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to SMAX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMAX dropped -3.90% vs KAPR's -16.91%.

On 1-year performance, KAPR leads with 23.24% vs 8.07% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KAPR has performed better with a 23.24% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAPR.

SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for KAPR.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SMAX and 0.79% for KAPR.

KAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAX and KAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer