SMARX vs. FHMFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMARX (Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust) and FHMFX (Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SMARX returned 1.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FHMFX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.

Performance

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) and Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMARX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than FHMFX's 0.85% return.

SMARX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 1.95%
• 10Y*: 3.02%

FHMFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 6.02%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust	0.74%	6.91%	3.73%	9.76%	-11.77%	0.76%	6.55%	7.77%	-2.01%
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund	0.85%	8.18%	3.13%	9.11%	-17.03%	-1.41%	10.15%	14.45%	-0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SMARX and FHMFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.88

The correlation between SMARX and FHMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMARX vs. FHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMARX

SMARX Risk / Return Rank: 28
SMARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SMARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SMARX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
SMARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SMARX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FHMFX

FHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) and Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMARX	FHMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.54	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.30	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.28	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.09	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.20	6.91	+0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMARX and FHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMARX	FHMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.54	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.12	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.47	-0.06

Drawdowns

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMARX drawdown since its inception was -47.07%, which is greater than FHMFX's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMARX and FHMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMARX	FHMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.07%	-22.95%	-24.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.61%	-3.24%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.19%	-6.45%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.20%	-22.95%	+6.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.85%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.97%	-6.31%	-0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.98%	-0.23%

Volatility

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) is 1.35%, while Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that SMARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMARX	FHMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	1.54%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.84%	3.23%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75%	4.40%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.16%	6.71%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.39%	6.51%	-2.12%

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMARX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FHMFX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SMARX vs. FHMFX - Dividend Comparison

SMARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than FHMFX's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund	4.83%	4.70%	4.52%	4.07%	2.65%	2.42%	3.05%	3.90%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust	4.77%	5.02%	4.07%	3.85%	3.53%	2.57%	3.35%	4.19%	4.55%	4.20%	4.87%	5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMARX and FHMFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SMARX and FHMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SMARX or FHMFX?

FHMFX has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to SMARX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMARX dropped -47.07% vs FHMFX's -22.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.