SMAP vs. SIXS
SMAP (Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, SMAP returned 9.43% vs 27.06% for SIXS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMAP charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SIXS.
Performance
SMAP vs. SIXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMAP achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly lower than SIXS's 15.94% return.
SMAP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 9.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXS
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- —
SMAP vs. SIXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 7.23% | 3.63% | -2.93% |
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 15.94% | 4.59% | 3.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMAP and SIXS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SMAP and SIXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMAP vs. SIXS — Risk / Return Rank
SMAP
SIXS
SMAP vs. SIXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMAP | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.34 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 3.79 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 11.39 | -7.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMAP vs. SIXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMAP drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, smaller than the maximum SIXS drawdown of -27.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAP and SIXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMAP | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.12% | -27.68% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -7.16% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.43% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.10% | -8.84% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.38% | +0.53% |
Volatility
SMAP vs. SIXS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) is 3.45%, while 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that SMAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMAP | SIXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 4.48% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 9.39% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 13.79% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 17.62% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 19.62% | +0.06% |
SMAP vs. SIXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMAP vs. SIXS - Dividend Comparison
SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SIXS's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.72% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.94% | 0.45% |
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMAP and SIXS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIXS has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to SMAP (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMAP dropped -24.12% vs SIXS's -27.68%.
On 1-year performance, SIXS leads with 27.06% vs 9.43% for SMAP. On fees, SMAP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SMAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SIXS has performed better with a 27.06% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMAP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.
SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.32% for SMAP.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 1.00% for SIXS.
SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMAP and SIXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer