PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAP vs. SIXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAP vs. SIXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMAP achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly lower than SIXS's 15.94% return.


SMAP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
7.23%
6M
5.99%
1Y
9.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIXS

1D
-0.09%
1M
8.01%
YTD
15.94%
6M
15.06%
1Y
27.06%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. SIXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
7.23%3.63%-2.93%
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
15.94%4.59%3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAP and SIXS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024

0.74

The correlation between SMAP and SIXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAP vs. SIXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP
SMAP Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SMAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAP Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. SIXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMAPSIXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.34

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.79

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.18

11.39

-7.20

SMAP vs. SIXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the SIXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMAP and SIXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMAP vs. SIXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMAP drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, smaller than the maximum SIXS drawdown of -27.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAP and SIXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAPSIXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-27.68%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-7.16%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.43%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.10%

-8.84%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.38%

+0.53%

Volatility

SMAP vs. SIXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) is 3.45%, while 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that SMAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAPSIXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

4.48%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

9.39%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

13.79%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

17.62%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

19.62%

+0.06%

SMAP vs. SIXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMAP vs. SIXS - Dividend Comparison

SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SIXS's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.72%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
0.32%0.48%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMAP and SIXS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXS has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to SMAP (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMAP dropped -24.12% vs SIXS's -27.68%.

On 1-year performance, SIXS leads with 27.06% vs 9.43% for SMAP. On fees, SMAP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SMAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SIXS has performed better with a 27.06% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMAP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.32% for SMAP.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 1.00% for SIXS.

SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAP and SIXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer