PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAP vs. EPSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMAP vs. EPSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMAP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EPSB

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.41%
6M
10.65%
YTD
19.37%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. EPSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
7.23%9.21%
EPSB
Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF
19.37%14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SMAP and EPSB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.86

The correlation between SMAP and EPSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMAP vs. EPSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMAP
EPSB

Industrials

22.3%
30.0%

Healthcare

17.5%
7.2%

Technology

13.9%
20.3%

Financial Services

13.1%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.2%

Basic Materials

7.9%
5.9%

Energy

6.6%
3.1%

Real Estate

5.6%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
0.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Utilities

-

2.8%

Industrials

SMAP
22.3%
EPSB
30.0%

Healthcare

SMAP
17.5%
EPSB
7.2%

Technology

SMAP
13.9%
EPSB
20.3%

Financial Services

SMAP
13.1%
EPSB
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SMAP
11.1%
EPSB
9.2%

Basic Materials

SMAP
7.9%
EPSB
5.9%

Energy

SMAP
6.6%
EPSB
3.1%

Real Estate

SMAP
5.6%
EPSB
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

SMAP
2.0%
EPSB
0.5%

Communication Services

SMAP

-

EPSB

-

Utilities

SMAP

-

EPSB
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMAP vs. EPSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EPSB
EPSB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EPSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPSB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EPSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. EPSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMAPEPSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.13

SMAP vs. EPSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMAP vs. EPSB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAPEPSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

Volatility

SMAP vs. EPSB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMAPEPSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.34%

SMAP vs. EPSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSB's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMAP vs. EPSB - Dividend Comparison

SMAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than EPSB's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EPSB
Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF
1.14%1.36%0.00%
SMAP
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
0.32%0.48%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMAP and EPSB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMAP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMAP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSB.

EPSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.32% for SMAP.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.88% for EPSB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMAP and EPSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer