SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L
SLXX.L (iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF) and FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - SLXX.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index while FLOA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLXX.L returned -0.77%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for FLOA.L. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. SLXX.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOA.L.
Performance
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SLXX.L is traded in GBP, while FLOA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLXX.L achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 2.45% return.
SLXX.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 6.04%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- —
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLXX.L iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF | -0.09% | 6.50% | 1.60% | 8.54% | -18.36% | -4.01% | 9.03% | 11.30% | -0.97% |
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.45% | -2.50% | 8.28% | 1.29% | 13.40% | 1.37% | -2.10% | 0.21% | 11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLXX.L and FLOA.L is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018 | -0.00 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SLXX.L and FLOA.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SLXX.L
FLOA.L
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLXX.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 3.41 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLXX.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.89 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.62 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLXX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLXX.L and FLOA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLXX.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -14.84% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.25% | -4.92% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.25% | -9.58% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.34% | -14.84% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -3.15% | -4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -6.00% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 1.77% | -0.40% |
Volatility
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 1.90%. This indicates that SLXX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLXX.L | FLOA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 1.90% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.81% | 5.15% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.59% | 6.76% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 8.65% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.08% | 9.29% | -1.21% |
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLXX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLXX.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
SLXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, while FLOA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLXX.L iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 4.93% | 4.82% | 4.68% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 2.06% | 2.12% | 2.44% | 2.71% | 2.73% | 2.99% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLXX.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SLXX.L.
SLXX.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index, while FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SLXX.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.
Find the right allocation for SLXX.L and FLOA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer