SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L
SLXX.L (iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF) and FLO5.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - SLXX.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index while FLO5.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLXX.L returned -0.77%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for FLO5.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SLXX.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLO5.L.
Performance
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SLXX.L is traded in GBP, while FLO5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLO5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLXX.L achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than FLO5.L's -0.05% return.
SLXX.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
FLO5.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 1.25%
- 3Y*
- -2.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLXX.L iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF | -0.09% | 6.50% | 1.60% | 8.54% | -18.36% | -4.01% | 9.03% | 11.30% | -2.77% | 2.25% |
FLO5.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | -0.05% | -6.83% | 1.88% | -4.56% | 11.92% | 1.15% | -4.18% | -2.07% | 4.95% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLXX.L and FLO5.L is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SLXX.L and FLO5.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L — Risk / Return Rank
SLXX.L
FLO5.L
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLXX.L | FLO5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 0.19 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 0.38 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLXX.L | FLO5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.17 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.13 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.02 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLXX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than FLO5.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLXX.L and FLO5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLXX.L | FLO5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -20.77% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.25% | -6.65% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.25% | -13.32% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.34% | -20.77% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -19.14% | +11.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -9.77% | +4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 3.30% | -1.93% |
Volatility
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) is 2.11%, while iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that SLXX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLO5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLXX.L | FLO5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 2.80% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.81% | 5.01% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.59% | 7.27% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 9.03% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.08% | 9.16% | -1.08% |
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLXX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLO5.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLXX.L vs. FLO5.L - Dividend Comparison
SLXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than FLO5.L's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLO5.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLXX.L iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 4.93% | 4.82% | 4.68% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 2.06% | 2.12% | 2.44% | 2.71% | 2.73% | 2.99% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLXX.L and FLO5.L have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLO5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLO5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SLXX.L.
SLXX.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index, while FLO5.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SLXX.L and 0.10% for FLO5.L.
Find the right allocation for SLXX.L and FLO5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer