PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SLVR.L is traded in USD, while GGRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GGRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVR.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than GGRG.L's 4.81% return.


SLVR.L

1D
-3.39%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
3.18%
6M
24.16%
1Y
108.17%
3Y*
42.86%
5Y*
19.09%
10Y*
13.51%

GGRG.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
3.11%
YTD
4.81%
6M
6.21%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLVR.L
WisdomTree Silver
3.18%136.72%20.15%-2.57%2.25%-14.66%40.61%13.97%-10.13%1.46%
GGRG.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
4.81%16.53%9.25%17.43%-13.72%19.80%15.98%35.02%-10.74%28.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVR.L and GGRG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVR.L
SLVR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GGRG.L
GGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVR.LGGRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.65

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

6.58

-0.79

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVR.L and GGRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVR.LGGRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.42

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.56

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.79

-0.57

Drawdowns

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVR.L drawdown since its inception was -79.93%, which is greater than GGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -30.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.L and GGRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVR.LGGRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.93%

-30.46%

-49.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.74%

-10.40%

-30.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.74%

-15.21%

-25.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.74%

-25.27%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.69%

-0.21%

-35.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.44%

-4.29%

-45.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.61%

2.61%

+16.00%

Volatility

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.L) has a higher volatility of 17.95% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that SLVR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVR.LGGRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.95%

2.72%

+15.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.26%

9.11%

+47.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.81%

12.06%

+46.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.81%

14.33%

+22.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.96%

14.76%

+17.20%

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVR.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRG.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLVR.L vs. GGRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLVR.L nor GGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVR.L and GGRG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GGRG.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GGRG.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SLVR.L.

SLVR.L is categorized as Silver, while GGRG.L is Global Equities. SLVR.L tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SLVR.L and 0.38% for GGRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVR.L and GGRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer